Court order in favor of Agra Co-operative | Republikein.com.na
Agra Co-operative's conversion? Company has? One step closer joscelyn godwin to reality after the court Wednesday in his favor. Judge Collins Parker Wednesday? Urgent application rejected by the registrar of co-operative for the conversion order granted in July to the cooperative, suspend. The registrar rejected earlier conversion, joscelyn godwin and Agra? Submitted joscelyn godwin an application to the court that they provide for the setting aside of the cancellation of the transition and the cancellation of Agra registration? Cooperatively asked. This application joscelyn godwin was granted by Judge Louis Muller. The registrar, despite his lawyer's failure? Answer statement to submit timely warning that he will oppose the application, not satisfied with the verdict. ? An urgent application in this regard at the end of August submitted to the court. In his ruling, Parker said that Mr. Tinashe Chibwana, who acted on behalf of the registrar, the court could not say under which section of the Supreme Court of 1990, the gemeneregwet or the rules of the High Court he submitted his application to the court. ? Mr. Chibwana presentation exclusively emphasis on the interpretation and application of Rule 4 (1) of the (High Court) rules, but this rule deals with the variation and revocation of court orders joscelyn godwin and it is not the burden of this court in these proceedings, ? he said. ? With the greatest respect to Mr. Chibwana, I find nothing in the documents that are almost, as the applicant claims, exist in his favor? Prima facie or clear legal points and protection. On the contrary, the respondent (Agra)? A right to be protected by this court under Section 12 (1) of the Constitution. For this reason alone should the application joscelyn godwin be rejected? Parker said. Chibwana his opskortingsaansoek argued that the order of July 29 this year unlawful joscelyn godwin as it is transferred to the mosiehof for matters not opposed. This was done after he was not in court on July 22 to put his case. He argued that? Notice of opposition on the court file and that the court should take this into account when the decision was made. ? The documents on record and before Judge Mueller served, showing that the applicant (when the respondent)? Notice of opposition filed against the application of the respondent (as the applicant) that led to the granting of the order of 29 July led. ? After this, the applicant (the respondent), within 14 days after the notice was filed, managed to submit his reply statement as required by Rule 6 (5) (d) (ii) determined? Parker said. He also found that Chibwana Müller? Could give an explanation why he has not submitted the statement. ? Therefore, in my opinion, Müller joscelyn godwin had the right to the July 29 order to grant. He had no good reason not to allow it, considering the circumstances that I outlined earlier about the respondent's constitutional right to protection. joscelyn godwin ? It would be unfair, unjust and onregterlik of this court to grant the relief requested in the notice of motion.? Parker Chibwana on the wrist for the manner in which the application is submitted. ? The action joscelyn godwin by Chibwana regarding legal issues driving under the rules can not save the applicant's damned joscelyn godwin application. After the 14 day period has expired, there was not? Matter for the judge to manage. By his failure to act in terms of rule 6 (5) (d) (ii) and (iii) and the fact that no reason joscelyn godwin for the court filed, has the applicant joscelyn godwin demonstrated that he is not much bad had and that the law taking its course without him. And the right to be exhausted. It is too late for Chibwana to talk about stewardship? he said. During joscelyn godwin the application Chibwana argued joscelyn godwin that the 14 days required by the rules of the High Court for the submission of statements were outlined, was not applicable to this case. During the proceedings, he and Parker? Fierce debate on the time-frames in business. The registrar's opskortingsaansoek cost declined.
Android phones can download joscelyn godwin BBM
I fall back, warns Harry
27 09 2013
27 09 2013
Related News
Social Reviews joscelyn godwin People Ministries Crime Environment Education Accidents
Agra Co-operative's conversion? Company has? One step closer joscelyn godwin to reality after the court Wednesday in his favor. Judge Collins Parker Wednesday? Urgent application rejected by the registrar of co-operative for the conversion order granted in July to the cooperative, suspend. The registrar rejected earlier conversion, joscelyn godwin and Agra? Submitted joscelyn godwin an application to the court that they provide for the setting aside of the cancellation of the transition and the cancellation of Agra registration? Cooperatively asked. This application joscelyn godwin was granted by Judge Louis Muller. The registrar, despite his lawyer's failure? Answer statement to submit timely warning that he will oppose the application, not satisfied with the verdict. ? An urgent application in this regard at the end of August submitted to the court. In his ruling, Parker said that Mr. Tinashe Chibwana, who acted on behalf of the registrar, the court could not say under which section of the Supreme Court of 1990, the gemeneregwet or the rules of the High Court he submitted his application to the court. ? Mr. Chibwana presentation exclusively emphasis on the interpretation and application of Rule 4 (1) of the (High Court) rules, but this rule deals with the variation and revocation of court orders joscelyn godwin and it is not the burden of this court in these proceedings, ? he said. ? With the greatest respect to Mr. Chibwana, I find nothing in the documents that are almost, as the applicant claims, exist in his favor? Prima facie or clear legal points and protection. On the contrary, the respondent (Agra)? A right to be protected by this court under Section 12 (1) of the Constitution. For this reason alone should the application joscelyn godwin be rejected? Parker said. Chibwana his opskortingsaansoek argued that the order of July 29 this year unlawful joscelyn godwin as it is transferred to the mosiehof for matters not opposed. This was done after he was not in court on July 22 to put his case. He argued that? Notice of opposition on the court file and that the court should take this into account when the decision was made. ? The documents on record and before Judge Mueller served, showing that the applicant (when the respondent)? Notice of opposition filed against the application of the respondent (as the applicant) that led to the granting of the order of 29 July led. ? After this, the applicant (the respondent), within 14 days after the notice was filed, managed to submit his reply statement as required by Rule 6 (5) (d) (ii) determined? Parker said. He also found that Chibwana Müller? Could give an explanation why he has not submitted the statement. ? Therefore, in my opinion, Müller joscelyn godwin had the right to the July 29 order to grant. He had no good reason not to allow it, considering the circumstances that I outlined earlier about the respondent's constitutional right to protection. joscelyn godwin ? It would be unfair, unjust and onregterlik of this court to grant the relief requested in the notice of motion.? Parker Chibwana on the wrist for the manner in which the application is submitted. ? The action joscelyn godwin by Chibwana regarding legal issues driving under the rules can not save the applicant's damned joscelyn godwin application. After the 14 day period has expired, there was not? Matter for the judge to manage. By his failure to act in terms of rule 6 (5) (d) (ii) and (iii) and the fact that no reason joscelyn godwin for the court filed, has the applicant joscelyn godwin demonstrated that he is not much bad had and that the law taking its course without him. And the right to be exhausted. It is too late for Chibwana to talk about stewardship? he said. During joscelyn godwin the application Chibwana argued joscelyn godwin that the 14 days required by the rules of the High Court for the submission of statements were outlined, was not applicable to this case. During the proceedings, he and Parker? Fierce debate on the time-frames in business. The registrar's opskortingsaansoek cost declined.
Android phones can download joscelyn godwin BBM
I fall back, warns Harry
27 09 2013
27 09 2013
Related News
Social Reviews joscelyn godwin People Ministries Crime Environment Education Accidents
No comments:
Post a Comment