Monday, October 13, 2014

Now, you might think a little dirty laundry is the small price we have to pay to save the planet. P


This is a translation of an article in the New York Times reminds us that the rebound effect is not a trifle. Although information on the cars is probably osram catalogue biased, not for this article is still useful. The article suggests the imposition of a carbon tax as the real solution to energy saving and climate change.
This is not a simple matter, but neither is anything related to dirty laundry. We've come a long way from the carefree days of 1996, when a report for consumers, after trying several top-loading washers with moderate prices and reported that "all washing machines get clothes clean stop."
The report this year, no top loaders that get top marks in the wash. The best results osram catalogue were for front loading washers that cost an average of $ 1,000 more. Even after accounting for inflation, cost $ 350 more than the cost of top loading washing machines in 1996.
What happened to the last top loading osram catalogue washing machines? Well, that meet federal energy osram catalogue efficiency requirements, manufacturers made changes like reducing osram catalogue the amount of hot water. The result was a lot of reports for consumers called "the day of casting osram catalogue failures" that left some clothes "nearly as stained after washing as before."
Now, you might think a little dirty laundry is the small price we have to pay to save the planet. Politicians of both parties have adopted energy efficiency standards as one of the easiest ways to combat osram catalogue global warming. Making appliances, cars, buildings and factories more efficient is what we might call the strategy easy way to reduce greenhouse emissions. But a growing number of economists say that the environmental benefits of energy efficiency have been overvalued. They say that, paradoxically, there could be even more emissions as a result of some efficiency improvements.
This problem is known as the rebound effect of energy. While there is no doubt that cars consume less fuel consumption rate per kilometer, the fact that we pay less in gas tends to encourage more driving. There is an indirect rebound effect as drivers use the money they have saved on gasoline to buy other things that also produce greenhouse emissions, like new electronic gadgets or vacation trips by plane.
Some of the biggest rebound effects occur when new economic activities arise as a result of energy efficiency technologies that reduce osram catalogue the cost of manufacturing products like steel or generating electricity. In some cases, the overall result is a failure: more energy than it would have consumed without improving efficiency.
Another term used for this phenomenon is called the Jevons Paradox, named for a nineteenth century British economist who observed that although the steam using energy more efficiently than coal stimulated both economic growth that coal consumption also increased. osram catalogue This paradox osram catalogue has been ignored by most modern environmentalists argue that rebound effects are much smaller today.
But economists osram catalogue continue to find evidence against it. The Center for Energy Research UK, after reviewing more than 500 studies on the subject, refuted the hypothesis that rebound effects are small enough to be ignored. The author of the 2007 report, Steve Sorrell noted that these effects could, in some circumstances, "increased energy consumption in the long term."
A literature review published osram catalogue last month by the Breakthrough Institute, a research group that studies American systems to curb global warming reaches a similar conclusion. osram catalogue The authors Jesse Jenkins, Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, warn that "rebound effects are real and significant" and could sometimes erode all the planned reductions in emissions. osram catalogue
"Proponents of the efficiency try to distract the attention of the rebound effect saying that no more use the vacuum cleaner just because it is more efficient." Mr. Shellenberger answered that "this view loses global and macro level, osram catalogue especially when you consider all the energy used in manufacturing and in the produc

No comments:

Post a Comment